Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
第二十一条 违反治安管理行为人自愿向公安机关如实陈述自己的违法行为，承认违法事实，愿意接受处罚的，可以依法从宽处理。。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法下载提供了深入分析
。关于这个话题，safew官方版本下载提供了深入分析
1. Best CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Российские власти понадеялись на возврат «лучших санкционных времен»Вице-премьер Новак заявил о желании Москвы сократить скидки на российскую нефть。关于这个话题，同城约会提供了深入分析
Гангстер одним ударом расправился с туристом в Таиланде и попал на видео18:08